Before embarking on a project, it’s essential to assess its risk level. The effort required in planning and initiation should be proportionate to the level of risk involved.

High-risk projects demand more preparation and contingency planning, while low-risk projects can move swiftly into the delivery phase. Over-planning a low-risk project can be as problematic as under-planning a high-risk one.

So, how do we determine the risk level of a project?

A structured approach using a Project Risk Profile Tool helps quantify risk based on key criteria and ensures an appropriate level of planning effort.

A project’s risk profile reflects its overall risk level to the organization. This is distinct from delivery risks (e.g., staff shortages, supply chain disruptions), which are addressed separately.

The risk profile considers factors such as budget, time constraints, scope, internal dependencies, external influences, and stakeholder engagement.

The Project Risk Profile Tool evaluates risk across six primary categories:

1. Project Cost

  • Budget Impact: A small budget percentage is low risk, while a substantial percentage of organizational funds is high risk.
  • Cost Estimate Confidence: A low margin of error (e.g., ±10%) is lower risk, whereas a greater than ±25% margin signals high uncertainty.
  • Funding Availability: Fully budgeted projects are lower risk, while unfunded projects pose greater challenges.

2. Project Time

  • Delivery Timeline: Shorter projects (under three months) are typically lower risk compared to long-term projects.
  • Confidence in Time Estimates: A smaller margin of error in scheduling equates to lower risk.
  • Deadline Constraints: Fixed deadlines, particularly for public events, add significant risk.

3. Project Scope

  • Familiarity: If the organization has delivered similar projects before, the risk is lower.
  • Stakeholder Alignment: Projects with clear stakeholder agreement are lower risk than those with unresolved disagreements.

4. Internal Factors

  • Operational Impact: Projects affecting only one department are lower risk, while those influencing core operations are high risk.
  • Dependencies: Standalone projects are safer than those relying on other projects or external factors.
  • Strategic Importance: Projects critical to an organization’s strategic goals carry higher risk.

5. External Factors

  • Health and Safety: Projects with significant safety concerns have higher risk profiles.
  • Political and Economic Conditions: External instability can increase risk.

6. Stakeholders

  • Project Team: Using current staff and proven partners lowers risk, while relying on new or untested collaborators raises risk.
  • Community Interest: Highly visible projects with public or media scrutiny are riskier than internal-only initiatives.

A risk profile tool assigns a numerical score to each category:

  • Low risk: 1 point
  • Medium risk: 3 points
  • High risk: 5 points

By summing these values and converting them into a percentage, projects can be categorized as:

  • Low risk: Less than 40%
  • Medium risk: 40-70%
  • High risk: Greater than 70%

For example, if a project scores 57.5%, it falls into the medium-risk category. Regular updates to the risk profile throughout the project lifecycle ensure it remains relevant as uncertainties evolve.

When assessing your project's risk, you can choose between two tools: the Project Risk Profile Wizard or a spreadsheet template. Each has its advantages and drawbacks.

Option 1: GPT Risk Profile Wizard

Pros:

  • Interactive and easy to use.
  • Provides immediate insights based on structured questions.
  • No manual calculations required.
  • Can offer additional guidance on interpreting results.

Cons:

  • Less flexibility in customizing scoring criteria.

Option 2: Spreadsheet Template

Pros:

  • Allows full customization of risk categories and weightings.
  • Can be shared and used collaboratively within teams.
  • Offline access for easy reference.
  • Useful for tracking risk profiles over time.

Cons:

  • Requires manual data entry and calculations.
  • Less interactive than the GPT wizard.
  1. Choose your preferred method: Use either the GPT Wizard for a quick interactive assessment or the spreadsheet template for a customizable and detailed analysis. [Insert link to spreadsheet here].
  2. Engage key stakeholders: Involve relevant team members to ensure a balanced and comprehensive risk assessment.
  3. Adjust planning effort accordingly: Allocate planning resources based on the assessed risk level to optimize project efficiency and success.

By using a structured risk profile tool, project managers can ensure their projects receive the right level of planning and oversight, avoiding unnecessary over-planning while mitigating critical risks effectively.

Introduction

What Is a Project Risk Profile?

Key Risk Assessment Criteria

How to Calculate a Project Risk Score

Choosing Between the GPT Wizard and the Spreadsheet

How to Use the Project Risk Profile Tool

Expanding Access to Project Management Certificati....

Understanding the Center for Project Innovation Pa....

Learn more

Talk to us about professional certification and higher qualifications in project management with the Center for Project Innovation.